Same Old Crap
**Please do not restack my posts. I set post to not be restakable, yet they seem to still be so.**
Would a Rupert Lowe party split the vote? Make it hard for Reform to win? Frankly, I don’t care. I have low expectations of Reform, so Reform, Conservative, Restore Britain, all the same to me. You can see how samey this all is when you look just behind the surface. (Lowe, less so, hence why he got his house raided.)
Recently Reform added Dr Alan Mendoza (Jewish) of the Henry Jackson foundation as the foreign policy guy. Basic bitch neocon stuff. Same old same old. Then they put vetting under some guy named Jack Aaron (Jewish). So we have a British party that has foreign policy outsourced to a Jewish guy (Marronos descent, apparently), and the guy vetting people is a Jewish guy (no idea of his background). (All this after Tice went to Israel, of course.)
Now I appreciate that we don’t live in vacuums and that transnational networks are of prime significance, but, you are telling me that out of 10s of millions of British people they couldn’t source native British people to run vetting and foreign policy? They had to be Jewish? Really?
What’s the chance that Reform will just end up as flesh puppet for Russian Jewish interests? Because it is probably a major concern of British intelligence, hence the Russian criticism. And why is it that the people defecting seem to be all linked to pieces of shit like Michael “I love Zionism so much” Gove?
Reform are dominating the polling and will inevitably do well, so why has there been so little defection by serious people to Reform? Is the vetting process going to be basically “on a scale of 1 to bazillion, how much do you love Israel?” with anything other than a bazillion being a failure. There is nothing new here. But if you go with Lowe and he get something up and running, it looks like an entirely different faction of jews (even more Zionist) will leap on it and likely control it. If key parts of your party aren’t even under the control of your own people, that’s a failure at the very start.
OK, you wan’t to present as foreign friendly to dampen the upper middle class/ lanyard lunatics ability to criticize, but at the back end you really shouldn’t bring anyone on board unless they can provide a family tree showing British descent. I suppose Mendoza is kind of there, but think about this another way. Would the Israelis be happy if a full on British person just plonked themselves down in Israel and then got put in charge of one of their parties foreign policy? and evidently had predilections for decisions that favored the UK? This is the same as the discussion of Pakistani MPs (no, just no.) and it is perfectly valid.
This gaping reciprocity deficit here is fatal.