In the future, the past couple of months will likely be marked by historians as the point at which beginning of the end of the current British state can be clearly demarcated.
Nothing will happen. Revolutions require youth, and British population is in advanced stages of decline. Older people don’t risk their lives to get the better future - especially when they have no children to pass this future to. UK won’t go away with a bang, but there will be a lot of whimpering.
Doesn't matter. The noun form also has a different spelling in US English... and a party name derived from that word can be changed as well. It's not like it's a trademark.
The revolution is not likely to be young British people against the Pakis. It’s more likely to be all of the Pakis taking over with the elderly Brits whimpering about it
Giving the vote to 16 and 17yr olds is to give them Digital i.d as they state you need i.d to be able to vote in the fake elections at polling stations
Then it's CBDC's and total control. They don't even have to pretend to print money then. As they have played us for past 7 decades we believe these useless civil servants pricks are above us. They were all sacked by Lords petition on Queen 23.3.2001 til the people seek redress. All elections are null and void. Reform won the last one but labour paid Mosques via Councils and Pakistani Rape Gangs and Blairs Postal Vote scam
Population Replacement is cause we are a threat to their wet dystopia dream. As all authorities are private Corporations registered at Companies House. DIGITAL POUND FOUNDATION LIMITED is the Govt they seem to be winning... cause we're do not know the COMMON LAW
"Giving the vote to 16 and 17yr olds is to give them Digital i.d as they state you need i.d to be able to vote in the fake elections at polling stations"
Although it doesn't seem to have been widely noticed, Labour also announced today that they intend to water down the ID requirements so that bank cards are acceptable identification for voters at the next election.
There has been a generational capture of all institutions of power and world-wide-suppression of most anything (TJOPV) True, Just, right-Ordering, Prudent, Charitable, .. and those that serves TJOPC unless it serves evil in some diabolical way.
The UK saw this with finance reforms and PM Liz Truss.. This is how one can stop who and what most likely would have been a positive world-wide benefactor and benefits.
Anyone that can't of will not believe that level of coordination between minions of the Synagogue of Satan need consider the generations of control that orcastrated what I display behind my outline in defense and background to all these articles:
--
1. Corporations working together:
I've tracked down the information to argue that since 1979 Gov and corp have been silencing and impoverishing regular people. If Synagogue of Satan Zionist and other minions had left well enough alone, you would not believe how much better we all and our nation would have been. Listen for taste, read for truth.
Agree with your assessment of the Pakistani rape gang outrage. No question; the cover-up demonstrates (at best) an unbelievable level of incompetence and ideological capture of the state in the UK.
On the debt, however, I do wonder..
Can someone explain to me why a sovereign country, with its own currency, needs to borrow money - with interest - from global banks, or from its own citizens?
If the state needs to pay for services, it can create new currency and spend it into circulation. Of course, it can’t go wild and spend more than the total productive capacity of the country, otherwise you get Zimbabwe.
But the state can - and does - create its own money. If it happens to create too much, it can adjust taxes to remove some money from the economy.
Why does it need to take loans, with interest charges, from private companies and individuals?
Because it spends more than it takes in and then avoids dealing with that now by kicking the can down the road. In many respects, that is reasonable assuming what is being spent on is productive and will lead to greater income in the future. At that point the borrowed sum is of less importance (plus the effects of inflation, of course.) if what you spent on is not productive but net negative, then you do have to raise taxes or cut costs but now you are double fucked because this will likely reduce your resource bases and force you to deal with major unrest. Riots, people just leaving, tax avoidance, political unrest- all sorts of fun and games. And now, you STILL don't have a path to improved income in the future. All you have is a mess.
Yes, it really does matter whether new spending adds to the productive capacity of the nation, or not. Which is why I support a Job Guarantee, but not UBI, for instance.
But my point was more about the *source* of the funds. If you’re going to spend, I’d argue that it’s better to spend government created money than borrowed money, because government created money doesn’t come with interest charges. Why saddle future generations with a ton of interest debt?
Neo-classical economics says that all government money creation adds to the money supply and is therefore inflationary. But that’s BS. If there’s too much money circulating, the government can tax it back out..
Picking just the Birmingham rubbish issue as an example of a larged problem, we're at a point where no one wants to volunteer for the task. At this point, why does anyone still look to the government for help? If you can't trust the state to be effective then don't leave it to them. Decentralise. Do it because it's your home and you care about it. I don't live in Brum so if this has been resolved then ignore my comment, but the principle stands.
The UK's old democracy was decentralized relative to today, it didnt begin real centralization until after ww2 and even then it wasnt until the latter-1970s/early-1980s that it began intensive centralization, and "wealth creation" began to decline as it did so, and as far as large systems go, the UK is at this point already very, very centralized...
Centralisation occurs, then new intermediaries are developed who then defend this new status quo to the death. The intermediaries of the process you correctly note are now the impediments. The various feifs of the bureaucracy, Quangos, charities, legal system, and all the rest.
“Things are just intolerable, let’s wait for the government to tell us what they’re going to do about it!” - UK people
Unduly optimistic imo
Nothing will happen. Revolutions require youth, and British population is in advanced stages of decline. Older people don’t risk their lives to get the better future - especially when they have no children to pass this future to. UK won’t go away with a bang, but there will be a lot of whimpering.
You spelled Labour wrong. Every single time.
US spellcheck on Substack. Ss to Zs, our to or, etc.
Yes, true. It should be spelled “ left”
Or just used the US spelling…
It's a proper noun, not a verb.
Doesn't matter. The noun form also has a different spelling in US English... and a party name derived from that word can be changed as well. It's not like it's a trademark.
Let's be a theocracy next time.
The Church of England was over run by woke women who reject scripture.
The crown courts became clown courts.
And 10 million of our people are aborted.
The revolution is not likely to be young British people against the Pakis. It’s more likely to be all of the Pakis taking over with the elderly Brits whimpering about it
Yeah, no.
Giving the vote to 16 and 17yr olds is to give them Digital i.d as they state you need i.d to be able to vote in the fake elections at polling stations
Then it's CBDC's and total control. They don't even have to pretend to print money then. As they have played us for past 7 decades we believe these useless civil servants pricks are above us. They were all sacked by Lords petition on Queen 23.3.2001 til the people seek redress. All elections are null and void. Reform won the last one but labour paid Mosques via Councils and Pakistani Rape Gangs and Blairs Postal Vote scam
Population Replacement is cause we are a threat to their wet dystopia dream. As all authorities are private Corporations registered at Companies House. DIGITAL POUND FOUNDATION LIMITED is the Govt they seem to be winning... cause we're do not know the COMMON LAW
NON-ENGLISH CAN NOT HOLD AN OFFICE OF AUTHORITY
Is Another DEI is constantly breaking
"Giving the vote to 16 and 17yr olds is to give them Digital i.d as they state you need i.d to be able to vote in the fake elections at polling stations"
Although it doesn't seem to have been widely noticed, Labour also announced today that they intend to water down the ID requirements so that bank cards are acceptable identification for voters at the next election.
Is that why the red carpet for boat people?
To supply votes?
Come on over to the colonies. Our donkeycrat party can give you the fine points on how to cheat in elections.
There has been a generational capture of all institutions of power and world-wide-suppression of most anything (TJOPV) True, Just, right-Ordering, Prudent, Charitable, .. and those that serves TJOPC unless it serves evil in some diabolical way.
The UK saw this with finance reforms and PM Liz Truss.. This is how one can stop who and what most likely would have been a positive world-wide benefactor and benefits.
Anyone that can't of will not believe that level of coordination between minions of the Synagogue of Satan need consider the generations of control that orcastrated what I display behind my outline in defense and background to all these articles:
--
1. Corporations working together:
I've tracked down the information to argue that since 1979 Gov and corp have been silencing and impoverishing regular people. If Synagogue of Satan Zionist and other minions had left well enough alone, you would not believe how much better we all and our nation would have been. Listen for taste, read for truth.
AI generated audio overview of article;
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/9fc1b713-4c44-49bd-9c29-04fc3fe09744/audio
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2223:, 14th July 2025, State's Organized Planned Disempowerment of the American Citizen"
https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2223
2. Entire once life, family, truth, justice, ordering, prudent, charitable, .. systems have become insane and dangerous:
A legal argument I have not seen before. Is it new?
AI generated audio overview of this article;
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/0a0572a6-8c54-4bbf-a3eb-829aae5e81e4/audio
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2222:, 12th July 2025, State's Monopoly on Violence is unLawful by it's own Actions and Laws"
3. Raised to be insane:
Ever wonder Why is this world insane and most of some group, women for example, of many topics and often on most, are so Sick?
AI generated audio overview of article;
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/dcc1110c-6fdc-4966-a0a6-10948155a59c/audio
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2220:, 9th July 2025, A Letter to Traditional Catholic Bishops, Calling for Champions."
https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2220
--
Feedback very welcome.
God Bless., Steve
Agree with your assessment of the Pakistani rape gang outrage. No question; the cover-up demonstrates (at best) an unbelievable level of incompetence and ideological capture of the state in the UK.
On the debt, however, I do wonder..
Can someone explain to me why a sovereign country, with its own currency, needs to borrow money - with interest - from global banks, or from its own citizens?
If the state needs to pay for services, it can create new currency and spend it into circulation. Of course, it can’t go wild and spend more than the total productive capacity of the country, otherwise you get Zimbabwe.
But the state can - and does - create its own money. If it happens to create too much, it can adjust taxes to remove some money from the economy.
Why does it need to take loans, with interest charges, from private companies and individuals?
Because it spends more than it takes in and then avoids dealing with that now by kicking the can down the road. In many respects, that is reasonable assuming what is being spent on is productive and will lead to greater income in the future. At that point the borrowed sum is of less importance (plus the effects of inflation, of course.) if what you spent on is not productive but net negative, then you do have to raise taxes or cut costs but now you are double fucked because this will likely reduce your resource bases and force you to deal with major unrest. Riots, people just leaving, tax avoidance, political unrest- all sorts of fun and games. And now, you STILL don't have a path to improved income in the future. All you have is a mess.
Yes, it really does matter whether new spending adds to the productive capacity of the nation, or not. Which is why I support a Job Guarantee, but not UBI, for instance.
But my point was more about the *source* of the funds. If you’re going to spend, I’d argue that it’s better to spend government created money than borrowed money, because government created money doesn’t come with interest charges. Why saddle future generations with a ton of interest debt?
Neo-classical economics says that all government money creation adds to the money supply and is therefore inflationary. But that’s BS. If there’s too much money circulating, the government can tax it back out..
The the Consumer Price index is understating the inflation.
I know. The last time I was in the UK I saw it first hand. Being charged £5 for a donut was my WTF moment.
The Government has not admitted covering up Pakistani rape gangs.
Picking just the Birmingham rubbish issue as an example of a larged problem, we're at a point where no one wants to volunteer for the task. At this point, why does anyone still look to the government for help? If you can't trust the state to be effective then don't leave it to them. Decentralise. Do it because it's your home and you care about it. I don't live in Brum so if this has been resolved then ignore my comment, but the principle stands.
The UK's old democracy was decentralized relative to today, it didnt begin real centralization until after ww2 and even then it wasnt until the latter-1970s/early-1980s that it began intensive centralization, and "wealth creation" began to decline as it did so, and as far as large systems go, the UK is at this point already very, very centralized...
Centralisation occurs, then new intermediaries are developed who then defend this new status quo to the death. The intermediaries of the process you correctly note are now the impediments. The various feifs of the bureaucracy, Quangos, charities, legal system, and all the rest.
it's a matter of making the right preparations to get through this, now
It has always been about making the right preparations.
Astute observations. Will be interesting to see if the state can survive the decade.
About time. They're about a quarter a millennia behind the curve.
Seems like you need haloperidol thrown into the water system, not a "revolution".